What is a Good Rating on Chess.com?

In the vast realm of online chess, where enthusiasts and grandmasters alike engage in battles of wit and strategy, the pursuit of improvement is a constant endeavor.

Chess.com, one of the premier platforms for online chess, has become a melting pot of players from around the globe, each seeking to hone their skills and elevate their game.

As players seek to have a concrete understanding of their progress, a common question echoes:

What exactly classifies as a “good” rating on Chess.com?

Of course, the answer is far from straightforward, as the definition of a “good” rating can vary based on a multitude of factors.

This article aims to provide a comprehensive answer to this question.

Whether you’re a novice in the early stages of your chess journey or an experienced player aiming for the top, understanding what constitutes a good rating is a crucial step toward setting and achieving your chess goals.

We will talk about the intricacies of Chess.com ratings, explore the significance of these numerical representations, and shed light on the diverse perspectives that surround them.

The Significance of Ratings in Chess

Ratings in chess serve a crucial purpose:

They provide a quantifiable way to gauge your strength and track your progress.

Without ratings, chess would be a chaotic landscape where your opponent’s skill is shrouded in mystery. Ratings bring order to this ambiguity, creating a framework for fair competition and meaningful assessment.

The history of chess ratings is a fascinating one. In 1924, Arpad Elo, a Hungarian-American physicist, revolutionized the game with his innovative rating system. This system, now known as the Elo rating system, became the global standard, adopted by organizations like FIDE (the International Chess Federation) and Chess.com.

Regardless of your skill level, whether you’re a seasoned grandmaster or a curious beginner, ratings hold immense value:

– For beginners, ratings provide a sense of accomplishment and motivation, encouraging them to climb the ladder and refine their skills.

– For intermediate players, ratings offer a benchmark for measuring their progress and identifying areas for improvement.

– For advanced players, ratings serve as a badge of honor, highlighting their dedication and mastery of the game.

There’s no global agreement on the classification of chess level by rating, but here’s a very rough guide:

  • Beginner: < 1200
  • Intermediate: 1200 – 2000
  • Expert: 2000 – 2200
  • Master: 2200+

Knowing your current rating can provide valuable insights:

  • It helps gauge your overall playing strength relative to other players on Chess.com.
  • It allows you to identify potential opponents who are within your skill range, ensuring a more balanced and enjoyable playing experience.
  • It serves as a motivator, encouraging you to strive for the next class and further refine your chess skills.

Cracking the Code: Understanding Chess.com’s Rating System

Now that we’ve explored the world of chess ratings in general, let’s dive deeper into the specific system used by Chess.com.

While it bears similarities to the traditional Elo system, Chess.com uses a modified version called the Glicko system. This enhanced version takes into account additional factors, such as your rating deviation (RD) — a measure of your rating’s stability and accuracy.

Think of your rating as a score on a test, and your RD as the margin of error. A high RD indicates that your rating is less stable, meaning your performance is more volatile. Conversely, a low RD signifies a more reliable and consistent rating.

But how does this all translate into actual rating points? Well, the basic principle is straightforward:

If you win against a higher-rated opponent, your rating gets a nice boost.

If you upset a lower-rated player, your rating gains are minimal.

Likewise, losing to someone weaker stings your rating more than a loss to a stronger opponent. This “weighted” approach ensures that your rating accurately reflects your true playing strength.

Here’s where things get interesting: Chess.com has separate rating systems for various game formats, such as Blitz, Rapid, and Daily Chess.

Each format has its own unique challenges and demands, so having distinct ratings allows for a more nuanced assessment of your skills in each specific time control.

I have written an in-depth article on whether you should play rapid (10-30 minutes) or blitz (3-5 minutes) chess, so feel free to have a look at it if you’re interested.

It is important to understand that Chess.com ratings are not directly comparable to official FIDE ratings. They exist within their own ecosystem and provide a gauge of your performance within the Chess.com community.

However, the core principles of rating calculation remain similar, ensuring a fair and reliable evaluation of your chess prowess.

Navigating the Chess.com Rating Landscape: A Statistical Perspective

With the Chess.com rating system established, let’s switch gears and explore some rating statistics.

Of the nearly 65 million people who play rapid chess, the average rapid rating is only 646.

Of the nearly 26 million people who play blitz chess, the average blitz rating is only 643.

A player rated 1300 in rapid is the 94th percentile. In other words, a 1300 rapid player on Chess.com is better than 94% of rapid players!

A 1300 rapid player on Chess.com is the 94th percentile.
A 1300 rapid player on Chess.com is the 94th percentile.

Since a player rated 1300 in rapid is in the top 6%, this must mean they’re one of the best, right?

Well, no.

You see, this is a classic example where statistics do lie. Sometimes, the numbers don’t do a good job of illustrating the full picture.

The reality is that there are many people who create Chess.com accounts, play and lose a few games, and never log in again. These people contribute heavily to the right-skewed nature of the ratings.

Practically speaking, an experienced chess player, or even someone who considers chess a hobby, would want to compare themselves against people who look at chess in the same way — not those who’ve played 5-10 games of chess in their entire lives.

If the leaderboards were cleared of those irrelevant ratings, then a 1300 rapid player may very well become the 70th percentile.

The Elusive “Good” Rating: A Matter of Perspective

Defining “good” in the realm of chess ratings is a bit like chasing a phantom. It’s a subjective term, its meaning shifting and evolving depending on your individual goals, experience, and perspective.

What constitutes a “good” rating for a beginner may be a mere stepping stone for an intermediate player, while a seasoned grandmaster would probably scoff at the very notion.

In a regular social setting, an intermediate chess player is probably strong enough to beat everyone they know.

For example, a 1300-1500 rapid player will most likely win against anyone at work.

However, once you reach the advanced intermediate level, say 1800, you begin to really understand how strong experts are, and how huge the room for improvement is.

Therefore, a chess player’s definition of a “good” rating is dynamic — it changes throughout their chess journey.

As your chess game improves, you don’t only climb the rating ladder, but you also realize how much more there is to climb.

This applies to almost every single walk of life: The more you learn, the more you realize there is more to learn.

For this reason, you will probably find that an 1800 tends to belittle their chess ability more than a 1400 does. The 1800 player is definitely levels above the 1400 player, but as well as knowing more about chess itself, they know much more about how difficult it is to become a chess master and they’re much more aware of their shortcomings.

Think of it like climbing Mount Everest. For a novice hiker, reaching base camp might be a monumental achievement that is a testament to their grit and determination. But for a seasoned mountaineer, reaching base camp is just the beginning — a prelude to the ultimate challenge of summiting the peak.

Similarly, the concept of a “good” rating transcends the confines of a single number. It’s a dynamic entity, evolving as your chess journey unfolds.

Your initial goal might be to simply reach 1000: the four-digit milestone that signifies a basic understanding of the game’s fundamentals.

As your skills develop, that “good” rating might morph into 1500, then 2000, and so on, each milestone marking another step towards mastery.

Ultimately, a “good” rating is a personal benchmark, a reflection of your aspirations and achievements on your unique chess journey.

Whether you’re aiming to conquer the highest peaks or simply enjoy the thrill of the climb, remember, the true beauty lies not in the destination, but in the captivating process of exploring the infinite landscape of chess.

Therefore, you shouldn’t get fixated on a singular definition of “good.” Embrace the subjective nature of this term and allow it to fuel your passion for the game.

Let your goals guide your path and your enjoyment of the game become the true measure of your chess journey’s success.

Strategies for Boosting Your Rating

Naturally, the common goal that brings together chess newbies, enthusiasts, established players, and even grandmasters, is improve our chess rating.

Let’s consider some strategies that will help achieve this goal.

(1) First and foremost, dedication to learning is paramount. Immerse yourself in chess theory, study the classics, and analyze the games of masters.

However, knowledge alone is definitely not enough.

(2) Practice is the most important cornerstone of mastery. Play regularly, engage in tournaments, and challenge players of varying skill levels.

The more you play, the more exposure you’ll get, and the more you’ll refine your tactical vision, develop positional understanding, and hone your decision-making skills.

Every game is a learning opportunity, regardless of whether it ends in victory or defeat.

(3) Puzzles are invaluable tools for improving your tactical prowess. By solving puzzles daily, you’ll train your brain to recognize patterns, identify opportunities, and calculate variations with increasing speed and accuracy.

(4) Analyzing your games is another powerful strategy for uncovering your strengths and weaknesses. Take time after each game to replay your moves, identify critical moments, and evaluate your decision-making process.

Was there a missed opportunity? A mistake you could have avoided?

By analyzing your games, you’ll gain valuable insights that will guide your future chess games.

The journey towards a higher rating is a marathon, not a sprint. Be patient, persistent, and most importantly, have fun!

Enjoy the process of learning and exploring the endless depths of chess. Celebrate your victories, learn from your losses, and embrace the challenges that come your way.

With dedication and the right approach, you’ll find yourself scaling the Chess.com ladder and witnessing your rating climb to new heights.

I highly recommend you read my guide on how to improve your chess rating with a systematic, realistic, and actionable plan. I’m sure you’ll find it helpful.

The Double-Edged Sword: The Psychological Impact of Ratings

Ratings can hold immense power over our minds.

They can be a source of pride and accomplishment, fuelling our motivation and driving us towards greater heights. But they can also be a double-edged sword, breeding anxiety, fear of failure, and even impacting our self-esteem.

It’s natural to feel pressure when your rating is on the line. The desire to win, to prove ourselves against our opponents, can be overwhelming. This pressure can cloud our judgment, leading to impulsive decisions and uncharacteristic blunders. In the heat of the moment, we forget the joy of the game and become fixated on the numbers, sacrificing our enjoyment for the pursuit of rating points.

It’s crucial to remember that your chess rating does not define you as a person. It is merely a snapshot of your performance at a given point in time. Losing a game, or even seeing your rating dip, does not diminish your worth or erase the progress you’ve made.

To help manage the psychological pressure associated with ratings, keep in mind these three things:

  1. Focus on the process, not the outcome: Enjoy the journey of learning and exploring the game. Celebrate your victories, but don’t dwell too much on your losses.
  1. Set realistic goals: Don’t get discouraged if your rating doesn’t skyrocket overnight. Aim for steady improvement and celebrate your progress, no matter how small it may seem.
  1. Embrace the learning experience: Every game, win or lose, offers valuable lessons. Learn from your mistakes, analyze your games, and use them as opportunities to become a better player.

At the end of the day, chess is a game, and its primary purpose is to be enjoyed.

Main Takeaways

The journey of chess extends far beyond the confines of ratings. It’s a journey of self-discovery, of intellectual challenge, and of forging connections with fellow chess enthusiasts.

Here are the key takeaways:

  • Ratings are a tool, not a goal. Use them to track your progress, but don’t let them define your worth.
  • Embrace the learning process. Immerse yourself in the game, study the classics, and never stop seeking new knowledge.
  • Challenge yourself regularly. Play against players of varying skill levels, participate in tournaments, and step outside your comfort zone.
  • Analyze your games. Learn from your mistakes, identify areas for improvement, and use this knowledge to fuel your growth.
  • Above all, have fun! Enjoy the beauty of the game, celebrate your victories, and embrace the challenges that come your way.

Finally, remember this saying by Arpad Elo, the inventor of the Elo system himself.

Any attempt to consolidate all aspects of a player’s strength into a single number inevitably misses some of the picture.

Arpad Elo

If you have any questions or insights you’d like to share, feel free to leave a comment down below. I’d be more than happy to have a chat with you.

6 thoughts on “What is a Good Rating on Chess.com?”

  1. Interesting article. I knew amateur and especially professional chess players kept score, but never realized there was a rating system. You outlined the usefulness of it, which is nice for someone like myself who only plays the game on occasion. It probably would also be helpful for more serious players looking to up their game and place their skill level into context with the experts. 

  2. This article on chess ratings is a gem for both beginners and seasoned players alike. The breakdown of the various rating systems and their significance in measuring skill progression is incredibly helpful. As someone relatively new to chess, this piece has clarified a lot for me.

    The emphasis on understanding the limitations of ratings and focusing on personal improvement resonates well. It’s not just about the number; it’s about the journey of self-improvement and the joy of the game itself. I’d love to hear more about your personal experiences or any anecdotes related to chess ratings, as it would add a relatable touch to this already insightful piece. Keep up the great work!

    • Thank you for your kind words Jono, I’m glad my article could clarify things for you and emphasize the true essence of chess beyond the numbers.

      Ratings are an important guide, but it’s the passion for the game and the dedication to self-improvement that truly matters.

      When I was a beginner, I was definitely hung up on ratings, but I learned to let go and embrace the learning process. When I lost rating points, I started to ask myself:

      Would I have preferred to win the game undeservedly and go up the rating ladder? No, I want my rating to precisely reflect my current level.

      The entire purpose of the rating system is to gauge your strength, so even if you’re lucky enough to win 10 games in a row without playing well, it will eventually show and your rating will tend towards where you deserve to be.

  3. Hey Yusuf. Your article is incredibly informative, especially delving into the significance of ratings in gauging strength and tracking progress. I also enjoyed reading about the Glicko system and its impact on rating stability. To me, it adds a layer of depth to the comprehension of these numerical representations.I’m curious about the strategies you recommend for boosting one’s rating. Are there specific approaches players can take to see improvement, especially for beginners?I look forward to your insights!


Leave a Comment