Can a Rook and Bishop Beat a Queen?

In the intricate world of chess, where strategy and tactics reign supreme, an intriguing question often arises:

Can a rook and a bishop beat the queen, the most powerful piece on the chessboard?

This endgame scenario has been sparking debates among chess enthusiasts for quite a long time, challenging conventional wisdom.

This guide provides an in-depth answer to this question of piece power.

This article uses algebraic notation like Rc7 and Bxf2+.

If you’re not familiar with it, I suggest you read my article where I explain all about this chess notation.

Numerical Value: Setting the Stage

First of all, let’s first establish an understanding of piece value in chess:

  • The pawn is worth 1 point.
  • The knight is worth 3 points.
  • The bishop is worth 3 points.
  • The rook is worth 5 points.
  • The queen is worth 9 points.

The numerical value assigned to each piece is based on its overall strength and mobility.

The queen reigns supreme as the most formidable force on the chessboard, but can its dominance be challenged by the combined might of two lesser pieces: the rook and the bishop?

The combined value of a rook and bishop is still one point less than the value of the queen, but as we shall discover, the answer does not only depend on the numerical superiority of pieces, but also on the subtle interplay of strategic thinking, tactical finesse, and the unique strengths that each piece brings to the battlefield.

It is crucial to understand that the value of a chess piece is dynamic; it heavily depends on the position and interplay between the pieces.

For example, a knight placed on a key square in the opponent’s territory can be worth well over 5 points, whereas a dead bishop blocked by its own pawns would be completely out of the game, so it wouldn’t be unreasonable to suggest that such a bishop is worth only 1 point!

The idea that a rook and bishop can beat a queen may seem counterintuitive, given the queen’s higher numerical value.

However, in endgames, where the board is stripped bare, the dynamics between pieces shift, and the rook and bishop’s unique strengths come to the fore.

The Relative Strength of Chess Pieces

To fully grasp the potential of the rook and bishop duo against the queen, it’s important to have a good understanding of the specific strengths and limitations of each piece.

The Queen

The queen is the strongest chess piece because it can move any number of squares in any direction.

The combination of mobility and attacking power makes the queen a formidable force, capable of controlling vast areas of the board and delivering devastating attacks from any angle.

The Rook

The rook is the second major piece. It can move any number of squares, but only vertically or horizontally — not diagonally.

Thanks to its linear control, the rook can dominate files and ranks, which makes it a crucial defensive and attacking force.

The Bishop

The bishop is one of the two minor pieces in chess. It can move any number of squares, but only diagonally.

The diagonal movement of the bishop complements the rook’s linear control. Like the queen and the rook, the bishop is a long-distance piece; it controls distant squares potentially extending across the entire board.


The rook and bishop working together can cover the same number of squares as the queen, but the queen only requires one move to reposition. This mobility advantage makes the queen the strongest attacker and the strongest defender.

To maximize their influence on the board, rooks must be placed on active files, and bishops must be placed on active diagonals.

In other words, long-distance pieces thrive in open positions.

In closed positions, on the other hand, space is limited as a result of many opposing pawns going head to head, closing down many files and diagonals.

In such positions, bishops and rooks become weak. They would only control a few squares, and therefore would have little to no influence on the board as long as the position continues to be sealed.

For this reason, the queen’s versatility is a particularly dominant force in the middlegame.

However, the endgame presents a different set of challenges, as most of the pieces would be off the board. In these spacious positions, the rook and bishop’s strengths really show.

The rook’s ability to control crucial files and ranks becomes even more valuable, while the bishop’s diagonal movement can create threats and uncover weaknesses in the opponent’s position.

The Rook and Bishop Combination

The rook and bishop form a dynamic duo that is capable of not only surviving against the queen, but also potentially outplaying and outmaneuvering it.

Their complementary strengths, when combined with strategic planning and tactical awareness, can create winning chances in a Rook and Bishop vs Queen endgame.

The combination of linear and diagonal control creates a powerful network of influence that can restrict the queen’s movement and expose vulnerabilities in the opponent’s position.

The rook and bishop’s ability to support each other is a key factor in their success.

The rook can provide defensive cover for the bishop, protecting it from attacks and allowing it to operate freely. In return, the bishop can assist the rook in attacking and defending, adding its diagonal firepower to the rook’s linear dominance.

However, the true power of the rook and bishop lies in their ability to create and exploit attacking patterns.

By coordinating their movements, they can form pinning attacks, where the queen is forced to protect one piece while another is captured.

They can also create discovered attacks, where the movement of one piece exposes another to capture.

Let’s take a look at a couple of examples:

Example 1
Black is threatening to win White's queen with a discovered attack.
Black is threatening to win White’s queen with a discovered attack.

In this position, Black is threatening to play Bxf2+, revealing the rook’s attack on the White queen.

Therefore, with White to play, they must be careful not to keep the Queen on the c-file. Alternatively, White can move the king away from the bishop’s diagonal, preferably to f1 where it’s more active.

Example 2
In this position, White is completely winning.
In this position, White is completely winning.

Thanks to the pawn structure in this position, White is completely winning despite being down 1 point of material.

White can play Rc6+, forcing the Black king to the seventh rank.

Then, White can play another rook check, winning the queen through a skewer.

White will win the queen once the king moves out of check.
White will win the queen once the king moves out of check.

Notice how the bishop is protecting the rook on c7.

The king recaptures, and White is up a full bishop in this winning endgame. White has a passed d-pawn, and the bishop can start attacking the pawns on dark squares to clear up promotion paths for more pawns.

This example sheds light on how effective coordination between the rook and bishop can sometimes beat the queen.

The rook and bishop’s versatility extends beyond their attacking power. We will see in the following section how they can form a sturdy defensive barrier, preventing the enemy queen from ever breaking through.

The rook’s ability to control key files and ranks makes it a strong defensive anchor, while the bishop’s diagonal control allows it to cover a vast area of the board, intercepting potential threats.

Creating a Fortress

With a rook and bishop, you can hold off the enemy’s queen by creating a fortress.

A fortress is an endgame drawing technique in which the player who is behind in material sets up an impenetrable defensive position.

The player with the material advantage is called the attacker, whereas the other side is the defender.

When a defender successfully sets up a fortress, they keep playing passive moves until a draw of some sort occurs.

Let’s take a look at a few examples together.

Example 1
Rook-and-bishop fortress: Example 1
Rook-and-bishop fortress: Example 1

In this position, there is absolutely no way for Black to make progress, so White can comfortably draw the game.

White’s king defends the bishop, while the bishop defends the rook.

Black can try to give checks, but the White king can simply move out of them while keeping the fortress intact — there is just no way through.

Example 2
Rook-and-bishop fortress: Example 2
Rook-and-bishop fortress: Example 2

In this position, the pawns add an extra layer of complexity, but since they are firmly blocked, there is no way for Black to break through.

The rook is preventing Black’s h-pawns from advancing while also covering the f4 square, so Black cannot push their f-pawn.

The bishop is protecting the rook and eyes the f4 square as well.

Example 3
Another example of a drawn endgame.
Another example of a drawn endgame.

Here, the defender (Black) has an extra pawn. However, they shouldn’t get too excited — the position is still a theoretical draw.

The reason is that there is no way for Black to coordinate their pieces in a way which allows the pawn to promote while avoiding perpetual checks from the queen at the same time.

However, things are different if the attacker is the side with the extra pawn, as we’ll see in the next example.

Example 4
In this position, White can play for a win thanks to the extra pawn.
In this position, White can play for a win.

In this position, the attacker (White) can play for a win thanks to the extra pawn.

You may wonder what the difference is between this position and that in Example 2:

In both cases, the attacker had more pawns, but why is that position a draw while this position favors the attacker?

The reason lies in the position of the pawns.

In Example 2, the pawns were blockaded by the White rook. However, in this example, the defender’s pieces are far away from the pawn, so it can advance and cause trouble for Black.

Therefore, in positions of this type, the defender should always aim to set up their fortress right in front of the pawn to block its advance. This would give them hopes of a draw.

Factors to Consider

According to GM John Nunn, the answer to whether a rook and bishop can beat a queen depends on the position in question:

A queen is usually worth more than a rook and a minor piece, but whether this material imbalance offers winning chances depends very much on the position.

GM John Nunn

John Nunn, a famous chess writer and a mathematician, is one of the strongest English grandmasters.

He is a three-time world champion in chess problem solving and was once in the world’s top ten players. He won four gold medals in chess Olympiads and finished sixth overall in the 1989 World Cup.

He is an accomplished writer; his works have won Book of the Year awards in many different countries.

We have already seen an example where the position heavily favored the side with the rook and bishop due to the pawn structure. However, GM John Nunn presents an additional factor to consider.

In his book Understanding Chess Endgames, he compares between two cases: one which led to a win for the player with the queen, and one where the player with the rook and bishop managed to hold on to a draw.

He says that the game-changing difference is whether the bishop is able to find an outpost; a key square on which the bishop can safely live without the threat of being removed by enemy pawns.

Scenario 1
Scenario 1: The Black bishop has no outpost.
Scenario 1: The Black bishop has no outpost.

In this position, White managed to trade off a few pawns and place their queen on h6, preparing to pave the way for the h-pawn to advance and eventually promote.

White is preparing to push the h-pawn.
White is preparing to push the h-pawn.

A few moves later, Black resigned as there was no way to stop promotion.

Black resigns as White is about to promote.
Black resigns as White is about to promote.
Scenario 2
Scenario 2: The Black bishop has a safe outpost on c4.
Scenario 2: The Black bishop has a safe outpost on c4.

In this game, Black managed to find a great outpost for the bishop on c4, where it is protected by the pawn on b5 and no White pawns can ever challenge it.

Black played passive waiting moves and White couldn’t break through. Therefore, the game ended in a draw by agreement around 20 moves later.

I have written a very thorough guide on outposts, so if you want to learn more about them, I highly recommend you take a look at it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1) Why is the queen worth 9 points when it is basically a rook and a bishop combined? Shouldn’t it be worth 8 points?

Each piece in chess is assigned a numerical value based on its overall strength and mobility.

The queen is indeed a combination of the rook and bishop in terms of having both linear and diagonal control. However, a queen is generally preferable to a rook and bishop as it has a mobility advantage; it only requires one move to reposition.

On the other hand, the need to coordinate the rook and bishop requires more moves, so the queen is more effective.

Also, keep in mind that the value system in chess is just a rough guide.

Is a rook exactly as strong as a bishop and two pawns? That’s not necessarily very accurate.

If you like, you may think of the extra point as a bonus for the queen being the most powerful piece in the game.

Q2) Can a rook and bishop beat a queen?

Yes, a rook and a bishop working together can beat a queen.

While the queen is definitely the most powerful piece on the board, the rook and bishop can be a deadly combination, especially in the endgame. Their complementary strengths and ability to create and exploit attacking patterns can make them a challenging opponent for even the queen.

However, this heavily depends on the position in question — extra pawns, the pawn structure, the presence or absence of a safe outpost for the bishop, all contribute to whether the material imbalance favors one side or the other.

Often times, the side with the rook and bishop can hold on to a draw by setting up a defensive fortress, as we saw in the examples earlier.

Q3) Can a rook and knight beat a queen?

A rook and knight can also beat a queen in chess, but it is more difficult than with a rook and bishop.

The knight’s relatively limited movement can make it harder to coordinate with the rook, and unlike the rook-bishop combination, this duo is susceptible to forks.

A queen cannot fork a rook and a bishop vertically or horizontally, since the rook would capture it. It also cannot fork them diagonally, since the bishop would capture it.

On the other hand, the queen can fork a rook and knight diagonally, so coordinating them is generally more challenging.

Having said that, in some positions, the rook and knight can be a very strong combination, and they may have winning chances depending on factors similar to those we discussed in this article.

Also, a rook and a knight can set up a fortress in a very similar way to the rook and bishop. Here is just one example:

White will draw the game thanks to this rook-and-knight fortress.
White will draw the game thanks to this rook-and-knight fortress.
Q4) Can a rook and bishop checkmate a king?

Definitely. In fact, you can checkmate with only a rook and a king. I have written an article which explains how to systematically deliver this checkmate. Have a look at it if you’re interested:

Two minor pieces are also sufficient to deliver checkmate: two knights, two bishops, or a knight and bishop.

If you want to learn how to consistently checkmate with two bishops, I have written an in-depth article explaining how to do that:

Q5) Are rooks and bishops stronger in endgames?

Yes — rooks and bishops are generally stronger in endgames than in middlegames.

This is because there are fewer pieces on the board in the endgame, which gives the rook and bishops more room to move and attack.

Some of the best endgames for a rook and bishop are pawnless endgames, where there are no pawns on either side of the board. This is because pawns can often block the movement of pieces, and without pawns, the rook and bishop have more freedom to move and work together.

Q6) What are some tips for improving your chances of winning with a rook and bishop against a queen?

Here are a few tips:

  • Find an outpost for your bishop: This will give your bishop a key square to safely stay on, which will make things more difficult for the queen.
  • Be patient: It may take time to create the right opportunity to attack the queen. If you are the side with a rook and bishop, a draw is usually a good result for you.
  • Don’t make exchanges that favor the queen: This will weaken your position and make it more difficult to win.
  • Try to win the queen: That’s the objective of course, and it’s easier said than done. Keep in mind that the queen is vulnerable to pinning attacks and discovered attacks. Be sure to exploit these weaknesses whenever possible.
  • Practice: The more you practice, the more experience you gain. With time, you will know whether an endgame favors one side or is a theoretical draw at a glance. There are many chess puzzles and endgame studies that you can use to practice.

Final Thoughts

The outcome of a chess endgame is not always dictated by piece value.

Numerical superiority gives you a general guideline, but the dynamic nature of positions often allows for unexpected outcomes, where strategic thinking, tactical awareness, and the skillful use of pieces play a pivotal role in deciding the game.

The queen, with its powerful combination of mobility and attacking power, is the strongest piece on the chessboard. However, the rook and bishop, in the hands of a skilled player, can form a great duo capable of surviving against and even outmaneuvering the most dominant piece.

Their versatility, complementary strengths, and ability to create and exploit attacking patterns make the rook and bishop a potent weapon in the endgame arsenal.

If you have any questions or insights you’d like to share, please leave me a comment below. I’d be more than happy to have a chat with you.

2 thoughts on “Can a Rook and Bishop Beat a Queen?”

  1. Hi Yusuf,

    I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to express my admiration for the impeccable color tone on your website; it complements the essence of the game of chess. The diagrams and pictures are not only enjoyable but also remarkably clear, making the learning experience quite engaging.

    Speaking from personal experience, I consider myself a reasonably skilled player; however, mastering the finishing moves has proven to be a bit elusive for me. I was wondering if you might have any suggestions or tips that could help enhance this aspect of my game. Your insights would be greatly appreciated.

    Looking forward to your guidance.

    Best regards,

    Dean

    Reply

Leave a Comment